Public Contracting Institute Blog
MUST YOUR PROPOSAL STATE YOUR INTENT TO COMPLY WITH EVERY PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT SECTION?
Assuming that the Solicitation does not require that your proposal explicitly state your compliance with each and every Performance Work Statement (“PWS”) requirement, and your proposal does not take exception to any PWS requirement, is this sufficient to commit your...
APPROPRIATE USE OF LOWEST PRICED TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE SOURCE SELECTION METHOD
Many people in the contracting world, including those in the Congress, have criticized the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (“LPTA”) method of source selection. The FAR includes a specific section that includes six criteria, all of which must be satisfied...
PROPER RECORD-KEEPING SYSTEM NEEDED FOR A COMMERCIAL TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE CLAIM
By Richard D. Lieberman, Consultant Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) 52.212-4(l) (Contract Terms and Conditions for Commercial Products and Commercial Services) states that: Termination for the Government’s convenience. The Government reserves the right to...
INCONSISTENT WITH CUSTOMARY COMMERCIAL PRACTICES
By Richard D. Lieberman, Consultant Both the U.S. Code and the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) state a preference for commercial products and commercial services. The U.S. Code states that: “[t]he head of each executive agency shall ensure that procurement...
CAN A “SUM CERTAIN” BE FOUND IN THE CLAIM?
CAN A “SUM CERTAIN” BE FOUND IN THE CLAIM? By Richard D. Lieberman, Consultant and Retired Attorney Most of this blog’s readers know that in order to qualify under the Contract Disputes Act as a claim, the claim must: Be a written demand or written assertion, seeking...
WHEN DOES THE GOVERNMENT BREACH THE IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING?
By Richard D. Lieberman, Consultant The Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing says that “every contract imposes upon each party a duty of good faith and fair dealing in its performance and enforcement.” Restatement (Second) of Contracts $205 (1981). ...
E-MAIL ACCORD AND SATISFACTION FOR A MODIFICATION
By Richard D. Lieberman, Consultant Can an exchange of electronic documents (such as emails) between a contracting officer (“CO”) and a Contractor’s Contracts Manager create a binding contract modification? The issue was recently explored by the Armed Services...
NEXUS AND THE CONTRACT DISPUTES ACT
By Richard D. Lieberman, Consultant Does a board of contract appeals or the Court of Federal Claims have jurisdiction over a breach of a government contract government if negligence is alleged in a claim, or does the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 USC § 1346(b)) Control,...
115 PER CENT PRICE PREMIUM NOT WORTH IT
By Richard D. Lieberman, Consultant When you read about best value (tradeoff) decisions in Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) bid protests, you may wonder why so many higher technically rated proposals with higher prices end up being selected for award. In...
GOVERNMENT CANNOT EXTEND A CONTRACT AFTER IT EXPIRES
By Richard D. Lieberman, Consultant In an interesting case, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“ASBCA”) held that the government cannot unilaterally extend services under FAR 52.217-8 (Option to Extend Services) after an ineffective attempt to exercise an...