Case of the Month – November 2020: Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc.

PCI has started a new webinar series, the Case of the Month Club.  Each month PCI’s Government Contracts law experts will discuss one or two recent cases.  The first November case is AT&T Coproration. View the session free.

Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc.
Government Accountability Office
Decided September 25, 2020

Facts: NASA awarded a $651.6 million Marshall, Operations, Systems, Services and Integration (MOSSI) contract to SGT. One of the senior NASA procurement officials assisting in the source selection decision had a close personal relationship with a high-level employee of COLSA.  COLSA is a prime contractor on a related contract.  Additionally, COLSA is one of the largest subcontractors to SGT on this contract.  The senior official attended weekly social events with the COLSA employee, involving “camaraderie, friendship, dinner, and …  competitive foosball.”  When NASA was informed of the relationship, ethics counsel recommended removing senior official from the procurement or not allowing him to attend the weekly social events.  The official was not removed, and only light mitigation efforts were attempted.  The senior official was deeply involved in the creation of the RFP.  Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE) protests the award on several grounds, including a conflict of interest involving the senior official.

Issue: Was there a personal conflict of interest involving the senior NASA official?

Holding: Yes, there was a personal conflict of interest that should have been mitigated.

Reasoning:  FAR 3.101-1 prohibits “any conflict of interest or even the appearance of a conflict of interest in Government-contractor relationships.”  The GAO found that even if the relationship and attendance at the weekly social events had not prejudiced any offeror, the appearance of impropriety was sufficient to taint the procurement.  The GAO recommended that NASA cancel the contract, and rewrite it without the involvement of anyone with a personal conflict of interest.

Related Post

Season 11: Episode 13: FAR Facts

Hello and thank you for joining us for Episode 12 of Fun with the FAR Season 11! In our next session, we will cover FAR Part 19 (Small Business Methods) and FAR Part 26 (Other Socioeconomic Programs). As we prepare for our 13th episode of Season 11, here are a few FAR...

Requirements Contracts: Words of Exclusivity

Requirements Contracts: Words of Exclusivity

The Federal Circuit recently clarified that an agency’s contract may still contain requisite language to make them requirements contracts, even if the contract does not include the required Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) clauses. Caring Hands Health Equipment...

How Not to Incorporate By Reference in a Contract

How Not to Incorporate By Reference in a Contract

A recent decision by the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (“Board”) demonstrates how careful and definitive a contractor must be (and, of course, an agency must be) in order to incorporate material by reference in a government contract.  Clean Harbors Environmental...