by Garry Grossman, Principal, McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, PC | Jun 13, 2013 | Uncategorized
Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc. (“DMS”) filed a complaint in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”), alleging that it had submitted to the Army a certified claim seeking cost and time increases on its Army contract. DMS stated in the...
by Garry Grossman, Principal, McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, PC | Jun 10, 2013 | Uncategorized
Two offerors, Insight Systems Corp. (“Insight”) and Centerscope Technologies, Inc. (“Centerscope”) electronically submitted quotations in response to a USAID solicitation. The USAID’s computer server malfunctioned and failed to forward on...
by Garry Grossman, Principal, McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, PC | Apr 12, 2013 | Uncategorized
The Coast Guard issued a delivery order under a GSA Schedule contract to U.S.I.A. Underwater Industrial Apparel (“USIA”) for 777 underwater dry suits. USIA delivered the first 100 suits with an invoice for $59,000. The Coast Guard tested these suits and...
by Garry Grossman, Principal, McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, PC | Apr 10, 2013 | Uncategorized
Nexant, Inc. (“Nexant”) protested to the GAO the award of a US Agency for International Development (“USAID”) contract to Deloitte Consulting, LLP, on the grounds that USAID (1) failed to conduct meaningful discussions, (2) applied an...
by Garry Grossman, Principal, McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, PC | Mar 21, 2013 | Uncategorized
Mission Essential Personnel (“MEP”) was one of three companies that held a multiple-award task order contract to provide intelligence support services for the Department of the Army in Afghanistan. The Army issued two task order solicitations. After...
