- This event has passed.
Case of the Month 2021
June 1, 2021 @ 2:00 pm - 3:00 pm
One event on February 2, 2021 at 2:00 pm
One event on March 2, 2021 at 2:00 pm
One event on April 6, 2021 at 2:00 pm
One event on May 4, 2021 at 2:00 pm
One event on June 1, 2021 at 2:00 pm
One event on September 7, 2021 at 2:00 pm
One event on October 5, 2021 at 2:00 pm
One event on November 2, 2021 at 2:00 pm
PCI’s October 5 edition of the Case of the Month Club will continue to look at cases decided on motions before the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals. Join our expert panelists as they discuss two CDA cases and a bid protest that you will not soon forget. The first CBCA case is Pernix Serka Joint Venture v. Department of State, CBCA No. 5683, 20-1 BCA ¶ 37589, in which the CBCA dealt with issues of contract delays caused by an Ebola epidemic in Sierra Leone. This is a particularly important decision because there are undoubtedly contractors that have faced similar problems because of Covid 19—they will need to see how important the question “What does the contract say?” will be in determining their likelihood of success on Covid-related claims.
Speaking of Covid 19, the second CBCA decision, MLB Transportation, Inc. v. Department of Veterans Affairs, CBCA No. 7019, 2021 WL 4130790, involved a contractor’s attempt to recoup costs it failed to recover as a result of the decline in business caused by the pandemic. The Government moved to dismiss the contractor’s claim for failure to state a claim—an argument based primarily on the fact that the contract was illusory and therefore unenforceable. The case is a reminder that both parties to a government contract need to ensure that the contract contains the appropriate FAR clauses.
The bid protest decision, Oak Grove Technologies, LLC v. United States, 2021 WL 3627111, contains a long and blistering analysis of the Army’s actions on a major procurement. The court concluded that the Army’s actions undermined the integrity of the procurement process and asked why it should not impose Rule 11 sanctions on the Government for its actions during the litigation. The case is a shocking example of what can happen when senior officials do not properly oversee an aggressive government employee.
This will be an action-packed session, so fasten your seatbelts and join us on October 5. As always, we strongly recommend that you read all three decisions (which we will send to you) before the program. And yes, that includes the 52-page COFC opinion—trust us, you want to read it.
Because the Case of the Month Club will look at recent cases based on their importance to Government Contracting, we will set the class’s Topic several weeks prior to the program. This will help keep the program fresh.
First Tuesday of the Month
2:00pm – 3:00pm ET